SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Pat) 394

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, SACHCHIDANAND JHA
Nutan, Rakesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S. N. Jha, J.

1. These three writ petitions involving the same dispute with respect to selection of the private respondents for appointment to the post of Fisheries Extension Officer have been heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment.

2. The Governor of Bihar has framed rules entitled The Animal Husbandry and (Fisheries) Service Recruitment Rules, 1993 (in short the Recruitment Rules) for appointment of, amongst others, Fisheries extension Officers in the State of Bihar. The said rules were notified on january 14, 1993. On March 2, 1993 the Secretary, Animal Husbandry and fisheries Department sent requisition to the Bihar Public Service Commission to make advertisement and selection with respect to 33 posts of the Fisheries extension Officer to be filled by direct recruitment. The advertisement was published on April 4, 1993. Candidates were called for interview which was held from March 21 to 23, 1994. The selection list in respect of 20 candidates was sent to the Government on March 24, 1994. No recommendation was made with respect to the remaining 13 posts as suitable candidates of the concerned categories were not available. The petitioner participated






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top