SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 89

S.K.KATRIAR
Rajni Shahi – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard Mr. Vishwanath Prasad Singh for the petitioner, Mr. Ajay Tripathi for respondent nos. 4 and 5 (Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited), and Mr. Rajendra Prasad Singh for respondent no. 7 (Smt. Nasema Khatoon). This writ petition in substance has been preferred to quash the selection of respondent no. 7 as the L.P.G. distributor for Belsand, district Sitamarhi and to appoint the petitioner in her place, or, in the alternative, to quash the entire selection process.

2. The respondent Corporation published an advertisement which appeared in the local dailies on 6.9.2000 (Annexure-1), inter alia, inviting applications for appointment of L.P.G. distributor at Belsand (Sitamarhi), reserved for the category of women. The petitioner and respondent no. 7 were also applicants, who appear at serial no. 2 and serial no. 1 of the meritlist.

3. While assailing the validity of the impugned selection, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the land offered by respondent no. 7 is unsuitable for various reasons. He next submits that the land offered by the respondent no. 7 was changed at a later date which violates the essential terms and conditions of the advertisement. He a





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top