SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Sheela Kumar W/o Arvind Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar Through Vigilance – Respondent
Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.
1. Heard Sri Khurshid Alam, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rakesh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Vigilance Department.
2. This revision application is directed against the order dated 12-12-2008, passed by learned Special Judge, Vigilance, Patna, in Special Case No. 30 of 2005, whereby he has rejected the petition of the petitioners under Section 205 of the Cr.P.C.
3. Petitions are facing prosecution under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A, 201/120-B, IPC and Section 13(2) read with Section (1)(d) of the P.C. Act.
4. The prosecution case in short is that a limited competitive examination of Government employees for appointment/promotion to the post of Bihar Administrative Service, Class II was conducted by the Bihar State Public Service Commission (BPSC). The examination has been termed as First Limited competitive examination. Only Government employees in Class III who had put in a given number of years in service were eligible to appear in this examination. It is alleged that a large number of candidates got themselves declared successful by adopting unfair and dubious means with tacit connivance of the officials of the C
Akram V/s. State Of Madhya Pradesh
Bhaskar Industries Limited V/s. Bhiwani Denim And Apparels Limited
Jayant Dang V/s. State Of Bihar
K.K. Patel V/s. State Of Gujarat
Madhu Limaye V/s. State Of Maharashtra
Manish Gai V/s. State Of Bihar
Rajendra Kumar Sita Ram Pandey V/s. Uttam
Ram Harsh Das V/s. State Of Bihar
Ravi Singh V/s. State Of Bihar
S.V. Muzumdar V/s. Gujrat State Fertilizer Co.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.