V.NATH
I. T. C. – Appellant
Versus
Shakuntala Devi – Respondent
2. Heard the parties at length.
3. This revision application has been filed against the order dated 06.12.2004 passed by Sub Judge II, Munger in T.S.No. 20/93 rejecting the petition dated 06.09.1994 filed by the defendant 1st Set praying for rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C.
4. By order dated 14.12.2007 this revision application has been admitted for hearing and the submissions on behalf of the petitioner has been succinctly mentioned in the order.
5. The plaintiff opposite party 1st Set has filed T.S.No.22/93, wherein the revision petitioner has been impleaded as defendant 1st party besides other defendants who are opposite parties 2nd Set to opposite party 6th Set in this revision application, for the following reliefs:-
(a) The court may be pleased to pass a decree for eviction against d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.