2012 Supreme(Pat) 592
PATNA HIGH COURT
NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH, ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH, JJ.
State of Bihar - Appellant
Versus
Ajay Singh & Ors. - Respondents
Death Reference No.7 of 2010 with Cri. Appeal (DB) Nos, 640, 643, 652, 675, 676, 680, 685, 688, 690, 693, 727, 729, 746, 807 and 823 of 2010
Decided On : April 16, 2012
Ashwani Kumar Sinha, Shashi Bala Verma and D.K. Singh, APP, for the State.
Surendra Singh, Rana Pratap Singh, Kanhaiya Prasad Singh, Krishna Prasad Singh, Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, Rajendra Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv., Ajay Kumar Thakur, Pushkar Narain Shahi, Vindhyachal Singh, Bhaskar Shankar, Ritesh Kumar No.1, Sanjeet Kumar Singh, Anita Kumar Singh, Prabhu Narayan Sharma, Sarvesh Kumar Singh, Sumant Singh, Aaroni Singh, Vipin Kumar Singh, Jyotsana Shankar Singh, Dr. Rajesh Kumar and Birendra Kumar Singh, for the appellants.
Rajesh Kumar Singh and Rana Pratap Singh, for the Informant.
Headnote:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302/149 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 366 – Murder of twenty persons – Death sentence – Evidence of PWs not found to be credible – There was a carnage in which about 20 people lost their lives but what actually happened has not been truthfully and correctly recorded – Information first received was never brought by prosecution to Court – Fardbeyan prepared much later with clear interpolation with regard to time of its recording – Prosecution has deliberately concealed first information allowing time for story to be built up which discredits correctness of involvement of appellants – Juveniles in conflict with law has spent a long time in prison contrary to law because of insensitivity of Trial Judge on this issue – Investigation was directed in a particular direction far from truth – Truth was deliberately suppressed by investigating agency – Persons who actually perpetrated crime got away with it – Conviction set aside – Appeals allowed. (Paras 14, 15, 16, 17, 29, 30, 46, 47, 54, 63, 68 and 70)
Navaniti Prasad Singh, J. –
On 11.07.1996, in the afternoon at about 2 pm, a carnage took place at Bathani Tola in village Barki Kharaon under Sahar Police Station (PS) in the district of Bhojpur in which allegedly about 33 named persons alongwith about 35 unknown persons massacred and killed 18 persons on the spot who were all ladies and children. Two more died subsequently, one being a boy of 25 years and another child of 6 years in course of treatment. Even though police and other high officials reached the village not long thereafter, the fardbayan, which formed the basis of the first Information report (FIR), was recorded only at 4.30 am, the next day that is 12.07.1996. At what time, the FIR was registered is not known. It is alleged to have been dispatched to the Court on 13.07.1996 reaching the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM). Bhojpur at Ara on 14.07.1996, In the afternoon on 12th July, 1996 itself allegedly some of the accused persons were arrested from their houses from Barki Kharaon with licensed arms and ammunitions. Police Inspector of Agiaon, on the same day, arrested some other persons and brought them to Barid Kharaon but they were produced in Court for remand on 14.07.1996. On 15.07.1996, 23 more accused persons were allegedly arrested from a lodge in Kariman Tola near-by the place of occurrence. Upon completion of investigation, charge-sheets were submitted and charges were framed against 62 persons for having come assembled with deadly weapons with intention to kill and brutally killed 20 persons and were. Accordingly, charged under various sections of Indian Penal Code (IPC), Arms Act and Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, (SC ST Act). Trial was apparently in relation to 53 accused persons as some died, some absconded and as against some, proceedings were quashed and/or dropped. Upon conclusion of trial, out of the 53 persons, 30 were acquitted and 23 were convicted. Out of the 23 so convicted, 3 persons were sentenced to death giving rise to the present death reference and criminal appeals. It may be noted that prosecution, in almost over a decade and a half, examined only 13 witnesses to establish its case. Out of the 13, 3 are doctors who conducted the post-mortem exan1ination and one, the Investigating Officer (IO). Evidence of one witness was discarded as he did not turn up for cross-examination effectively leaving only 8 witnesses in relation to the occurrence. The trial Court rejected the evidence of these private witnesses with exception of two for the purposes of convicting these 23 persons.
2. While the appeals were pending before this Court, on behalf of 4 persons, applications were filed claiming juvenility. This Court, prima facie being satisfied, referred their cases to the Juvenile Justice Board for determination of their age on the date of occurrence. Report being received, 3 of them were declared juvenile which included one Manoj Singh of Cr Appeal (DB) No. 688 of 2010 who was sentenced to death. The result is that all these cases and the death reference is relevant for 20 convictions with two death sentences included therein. The persons, who have been found to be juvenile, are Bela Singh in Cr Appeal (DB) No. 652 of 2010, Manoj Singh in Cr Appeal (DB) No. 688 of 2010, who has been sentenced to death, Dilip Singh, appellant No.3 in Cr Appeal (DB) No. 727 of 2010. The other persons, who have been sentenced to death, are Narendra Singh @ Nagendra Singh in Cr Appeal (DB) No. 680 of 2010 and Ajay Singh in Cr Appeal (DB) No. 693 of 2010. All the other convicted persons have been sentenced to life imprisonment in the connected 15 appeals including appeals of the condemned persons.
3. Briefly, the prosecution case is based upon an alleged fardbayan (Exhibit 3) of Kishun Choudhary (PW 12) of Bathani Tola, P S Sahar. District Bhojpur recorded by SI Umesh Kumar Singh, the Officer-in-charge, Sahar PS and the IO (PW 13) at Bathani Tola at 4.30 a.m. on 12