MIHIR KUMAR JHA
Anita Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The prayer of the petitioner in C.W.J.C No. 5576 of 2008 reads as follows:-
“That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondents concerned for payment of retrial dues of the husband of the petitioner who was working as night guard in Bihar State Cooperative Marketing Union Limited (BISCOMAUN) at Sitamarhi and died in harness on 24.4.2003.”
3. The prayer of the petitioner in C.W.J.C No. 15818 of 2011 reads as follows:-
“That this application is directed on behalf of aforesaid petitioner for issuance of appropriate writ, order or direction as the case may for payment of post retrial dues of her husband Surendra Prasad Singh alongwith dues, salary, who died on-5.9.2007 while was serving as the Asstt Depot Manager Biscoman Respondent No. 2.”
4. As would be evident, the relief has been sought in both these writ applications against the Bihar State Cooperative Marketing Union Limited (BISCOMAUN), which is admittedly a society registered under the Bihar Cooperative Societies Act.
5. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners have raised preliminary objection as with regard to maintaina
Harendra Narain Banker vs. State of Bihar and others
Rajendra Prasad Sah & Ors vs. the State of Bihar & Ors reported in 2000 (4) PLJR 273
Organizer, Dehri C.D. & C.M. Union Limited vs. The State of Bihar & Ors
Madhur Rajak & Anr vs. State of Bihar and Anr.
Harendra Narain Banker Vs. State of Bihar and others
Nand Kishore Rai Vs. State of Bihar
Abdul Wahid vs. State of Bihar & Ors.
Devendra Kumar Singh vs. Administrator, Bihar Coop Mkt. Un. Ltd. & Anr
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.