SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Pat) 1483

RAVI RANJAN
Vijay Kumar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.

1. Heard parties. Petitioner challenges the order dated 25.9.2012/21.12.2012 passed in Miscellaneous Case No. 96/2009-10 by the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Siwan by which it has been held that Jamabandi of the petitioner is doubtful and there is apprehension of it being fraudulent, therefore, the demand of the petitioner for compensation for the alleged use of Plot No. 1682 appertaining to Khata No. 101, area about 9 katthas is unacceptable and further the Anchal Adhikari has been directed to make a detailed enquiry and, thereafter, take steps for cancellation of Jamabandi, which is running in the name of the petitioner. The petitioner has admittedly purchased the land through a registered sale deed dated 2.3.1977 from one Baiju Lal Prasad and thereafter, his Jamabandi No. 315 was created by the State of Bihar. Petitioner claims that the rent was being paid by him and receipt was being granted by the State authority. When 3 katthas and 5 Dhurs of land was being used for construction of a road then the petitioner approached this Court by filing C.W.J.C. No. 5779 of 2007 which was disposed of vide Annexure-4 dated 28.10.2009 granting liberty to the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top