SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH, ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
Nathufal, son of Late Halim – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI, J.
Sole appellant, Nathufal, who has been found guilty for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment vide judgment of conviction dated 23.12.2010 and order of sentence dated 24.12.2010 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-6, Purnea in Sessions Trial No. 1017 of 2007/105 of 2009 challenged the same under present appeal.
2. Perwez Alam (PW-5) aged about 12 years, who happens to be son of the appellant had recorded his fard-beyan on 19.08.2007 at about 7.50 a.m. at his house alleging inter alia that in the preceding night he slept with his younger brother Maskur Alam. PW-6 aged about 7 years in his room having east front, his father, mother along with younger sister slept in western room. At about 3.00 a.m., he awoke hearing cry of his mother coming from western room whereupon he rushed and then, saw his father Nuthfal, who was armed with Dabiya and was assaulting his mother. His mother was lying on the ground. His father had struck on neck, hand by Dabiya and caused her death. Soon thereof, he also inflicted injury on his own head by Dabiya and fell down. Blood was oozing out. He began
Ashok Kumar Todi vs. Kishwar Jahan and others reported in (2011) 3 SCC 758
H.N. Rishbud & Anr. v. State of Delhi
Navinchandra N. Majithia vs. State of Meghalaya and Ors.
Podda Narayana Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Ratnesh Kumar Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2015) 3 SCC 536
Rajasthan Pharmaceuticals Laboratory, Bangalore & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka
State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram reported in (2006) 12 SCC 254
Sambhu Das @ Bijoy Das and another vs. State of Assam reported in (2010) 10 SCC 374
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.