RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel representing the State as well as learned counsel representing the private respondents.

2. This application has been preferred seeking modification of the order dated 28.08.2018 passed in Cr. W.J.C No. 431 of 2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset submits that the petitioner is not looking for any recall or review of the order on its merit. The prayer of the petitioner is only with respect to the observations of this Court occurring in Paragraph Nos. 34 and 35 of the order passed by this Court wherein this Court while directing the State to pay the cost of Rs. 25,000/- to each of the petitioners observed that the same may be recovered from the then Principal Secretary, Department of Registration, Excise and Prohibition, Government of Bihar. This Court also observed that the State Government should consider and take a view on the action of the then Principal Secretary, Department of Registration, Excise and Prohibition, Government of Bihar and find out as to why appropriate action be not taken against him for directing such whimsical prosecution of the Bank Officials, in ha