ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH, BIRENDRA KUMAR, ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
State of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Secondary Education, Human Resources Department, Bihar, Patna – Appellant
Versus
Asha Sharma, wife of Shri Birendra Kumar Sinha – Respondent
ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY, J.
LPA No. 1568 of 2011
1. The Division Bench in this appeal preferred by the State of Bihar against the judgment of the Single Judge dated 23rd March, 2011, in CWJC No. 1046 of 2006, had noticed conflicting judgments of two Division Benches – one reported in 2007 (2) PLJR 239 (Shyam Kishore Singh vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) and the other in the matter of Madho Sharma vs. the State of Bihar & Ors. in CWJC No. 15725 of 2010, decided on 5th July, 2013 and, on consideration of Government Circulars dated th November, 1978 and 30th August, 1980 as well as the Bihar Non-Government Secondary Schools (Taking Over of Control and Management) Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1981”) and Bihar Nationalized Secondary Schools (Service Conditions) Rules, 1983 (hereinafter referred to as “1983 Rules”) noted that there are three diverse opinions for calculating the service for the purposes of pensionary benefits:
(a) to count service from the date of take over treating the nonteaching employee as government servant (b) counting the service from the date of grant of recognition of the non government school and (c) reckoning of service from the date of g
Shyam Kishore Singh vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.
Gopal Jha vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.
State of Bihar & Ors. vs Bhagwan Singh
Dwarka Nath Tiwary vs. State of Bihar
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.