IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Mohit Kumar Shah, J.
M/s Naturals Dairy (p) Ltd, Bihar - Appellant
Versus
Chief Manager Bank Of Baroda, Patna - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5858 of 2020
Decided On : 05-03-2021
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 – Section 13 – Recovery of debt – Refusal to issue No-Dues Certificate to Petitioner unless and until further interest is paid – Petitioner has not only defaulted in honouring its One-time settlement Proposal but has also failed to honour terms and conditions of letter of respondent Bank whereby and whereunder compromise proposal had been sanctioned by respondent-Bank for petitioner – Respondent-Bank has rightly charged interest as agreed, on balance compromise amount – It does not lie in mouth of petitioner to now turn around and vent his grievance regarding charging of interest by respondent-Bank for delay caused in repayment of compromise amount, beyond agreed period of settlement – Petitioner has been a perpetual defaulter and has left no stone unturned to evade making payment of outstanding dues of respondent-Bank and now, it is still maliciously and unnecessarily engaging in vexatious litigation without there being any legal basis to do so – Writ petition dismissed. (Paras 11 to 14)
JUDGMENT
Mohit Kumar Shah, J. - The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs :-
(i) To issue an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ directions(s) in the nature of Certiorari quashing the letter no. BOB:SARPTN: 2019-20 dated 06.02.2020, whereby and whereunder the respondents have malafidely and arbitrarily refused to issue No Dues Certificate to the Petitioner unless and until further interest is paid.
(ii) To issue an appropriate writ/ order/ direction in the nature of Mandamus declaring that the demand of interest by the respondents upon the OTS amount is not in consonance with the Baroda MSME OTS Scheme No. BCC:BR:111/333 dated 09.07.2019 under which the OTS was sanctioned to the petitioner-Company.
(iii) To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to forthwith issue a No Dues Certificate to the petitioner-Company as the complete amount of Rs. 240 lakhs under the OTS sanction has been duly paid by the petitioner-Company in terms of the Baroda MSME OTS Scheme.
(iv) To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to also release all the original collateral security documents in favour of the petitioner-Company and release the personal guarantees of all the Directors/ Guarantors in their individual capacity.
(v) To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove all charge/mortgage/lien on the assets of the petitioner-Company by issuing appropriate letters to the concerned authorities including BIADA and MCA portal.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitionerCompany had established a factory in the year 2008 for manufacturing milk, ghee, panner, dahi, ice-cream and other related milk products. The petitioner- Company had then approached the respondent-Bank of Baroda for availing term loan advance for a sum of Rs. 200.00 lacs and the same was sanctioned by the respondent-Bank in the month of February, 2008 vide letter dated 12.03.2008. Without going into the details and history of the case, it would suffice to state here that ultimately, the petitioner had submitted a One- time Settlement Proposal vide letter dated 29.08.2019, addressed to the Chief Manager, Bank of Baroda, Asset Recovery Branch, Patliputra Colony, Patna, relevant portions whereof is reproduced herein below :-
As per the discussion held whereby confirm and revise our One Time proposal from Rs. 1,90,000,00/- (Rupees One crore Ninety lac only) to Rs. 2,40,000,00/- (Rupees two crore forty lac only). This amount of Rs. 2,40,000,00/- (Rupees two crore forty lac only) has been agreed by the officials present in this meeting. This is absolute amount including all.
As soon as the Bank agrees with the abovementioned proposal, we shall make a fixed deposit of Rs. 240.00 lacs and submit a zerox copy of the said FDR receipt in order to show my bonafides. Once an OTS sanction letter is received from the competent authority of the Bank, we shall submit/ deposit the said FDR receipt in original to the Bank towards full and final settlement of the loan amount with the assurance that a NO DUES certificate would be immediately issued in favour of the Company. It would also be incumbent upon the Bank to release all security documents in original mortgaged with the Bank. Furthermore, the Bank will withdraw all litigation from all the courts/ DRT.
3. The respondent-Bank by its letter dated 24.09.2019 had sanctioned a compromise proposal for the petitioner in the following terms :-
We are pleased to inform you that out higher authority has sanctioned Compromise Proposal offered by you in tune of Rs. 240.00 lakh (Rupees Two Crore Forty Lac only) towards the full and final settlement of the account in name of M/s Natural Dairy Pvt. Ltd. having book dues of Rs. 61.97 lac in Term Loan Account (18630600001230) & Rs. 32.03 lacs in Term Loan Account (18630600001835) and Rs. 75.59 lac in Cash Credit Account (186
Point of law: Loans by financial institutions are granted from public money generated at the taxpayer’s expense. Such loan does not become the property of the person taking the loan, but retains its ....
The judgment establishes the court's power to grant extension of time for payment under the OTS, based on the RBI guidelines and the principles of equity and justice.
The court emphasized that the delay in legal proceedings should not prejudice the parties and outlined illustrative guidelines for granting OTS extension, considering the borrower's bona fide intent ....
The Court emphasized the Bank's obligation to act fairly and reasonably, and held that the refusal to grant an extension for OTS payment was arbitrary and violative of constitutional provisions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principles of novation, discharge of liability, and reasonable compensation for delay in payment under the Indian Contract A....
The decision reaffirms that the grant of benefit under the OTS is subject to the eligibility criteria and the commercial wisdom of the bank, and highlights the availability of alternative remedies un....
The High Courts have the jurisdiction to extend the period of settlement as originally provided for in OTS letter, subject to certain guidelines, and the Court may consider granting extension of time....
Point of Law : The terms of one-time settlement scheme cannot also be interfered with or varied to the advantage or disadvantage of any person by resorting to the powers under Article 226 of the Cons....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.