M. S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, H. S. MADAAN
Hardyal Singh Cheema – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J. -
The Background facts
1. Petitioner is a guarantor to the loan taken by the Cheema Spintex Limited (for short 'the Company') from the State Bank of India (for short 'the Bank').
2. In 1997, the Company had obtained certain facilities from the Bank and at that time the petitioner, who was also a Director of the Company, stood as a guarantor and pledged his assets in support of the loan.
3. According to the petitioner, on account of the reasons beyond the control of the Company, it could not meet its repayment obligations and came to be classified as Non Performing Asset on 13.03.2016.
4. After the Covid-19 Pandemic started in 2020, the Bank floated an OTS scheme called 'SBI OTS Scheme 2020' and pursuant thereto the Bank itself issued a letter dt.26.10.2020 (P1) informing the Company that it is eligible for settlement under the said scheme. In that letter dt. 26.10.2020, OTS amount was fixed at Rs. 2,96,53,886.98. The Company had to deposit minimum of 5% of the OTS amount along with its application and on 21.11.2020 vide letter (P-2), the Company sub
ABL International Ltd. vs. Export Credit Guarantee Corpn. of India Ltd.
Central Bank of India vs. Ravindra
Citadel Fine Pharmaceuticals vs. Ramaniyam Real Estates Private Limited and another
Gomathinayagam Pillai and Others vs. Palaniswami Nadar
Kedar Nath Agrawal vs. Dhanraji Devi
National Highways Authority of India vs. Ganga Enterprises
Sardar Associates vs. Punjab and Sind Bank
Shikharchand Jain vs. Digamber Jain PrabandKarini Sabha, (1974) 1 SCC 675
State Bank of India vs. Vijay Kumar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.