JUDGMENT

Sanjay Karol, C.J. - Similar set of prayers and facts are made in all the writ petitions, which are disposed of vide this common judgment. For ready reference, we reproduce the prayers made by the petitioners in the first petition, i.e. CWJC No.4098 of 2019 titled as Shri Raj Kumar Gupta @ Raj Kumar Sultania @ Raju Sultania Versus The Union of India & anr.:

"(a) For holding the Order-In-Original No. 16/MP/Ayukt/2018 dated 05.10.2018 and the Corrigendum being C. No. V(15)33-Adjn/2014/12895 dated 22.11.2018 issued by the Respondent No. 2 as being illegal, invalid and unsustainable in the eye of law.

(b) For issuance of a consequential writ or order or direction upon the respondents to allow the petitioner to grant an opportunity of crossexamination of persons whose statements are relied upon and also officers of the Department in terms of the reply dated 23/24.06.2015 and 18.11.2016;

(c) For issuance of a direction to the respondents to supply the entire documents/ evidences to the petitioner upon which they relied upon and passed the impugned order as against the petitioner;

(d) For grant of any other relief or reliefs to which the petitioner is found entitled to in the facts a