IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J.
Ram Bilash Singh, son of Late Gajo Singh - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department (Higher Education), Govt. of Bihar, Patna – Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1628 of 2019
Decided On : 10-12-2020
University Law – Retiral Dues – In matters relating to payment of retiral benefits, award of interest on delayed payment would form an integral part of relief even if no separate relief is claimed/pleaded for the same, as only after Court takes a view with regard to role of parties concerning any inordinate delay in payment, only thereafter would necessary consequences in law flow including a decision on issue of payment of interest – Petitioner is also entitled to award of interest – 9% simple interest awarded – It is high time State takes proactive steps for fixing accountability for delayed payments on concerned authorities, especially those of Universities, for ultimately burden is that on State exchequer, meaning common man – Pension and gratuity are not bounties to be distributed by Government to its employees on their retirement but, have become valuable rights and property in their hands and any culpable delay in settlement and disbursement thereof must be dealt with by payment of interest at current market rate till actual payment is made – Education Department directed to formulate a policy to maintain a system of monitoring to fix responsibility in matter of delays which leads to interest having to be paid, either under statutory provisions or by/under order(s) of Court(s). (Paras 15, 25, 26 and 29)
(2020) 1 SCC 1 – Referred.
2020 SCC OnLine SC 802; (1988) 3 SCC 449; (1981) 3 SCC 528; (1983) 1 SCC 305; (1985) 1 SCC 429; (2008) 3 SCC 44; (2013) 12 SCC 210; (2014) 8 SCC 894; (2003) 3 SCC 40; (2007) 3 SCC 545; (2001) 9 SCC 687 – Relied.
JUDGMENT :
1. The matter has been taken up via video-conferencing due to circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. Heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, learned Assistant Counsel to Standing Counsel 13 for the State; Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, learned counsel for the Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University (hereinafter referred to as the ‘University’); and Mr. Rashid Izhar, learned counsel for the Munger University.
3. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following reliefs:
4. On 11.11.2020, the matter was adjourned in the following terms:
4. On such plea, learned counsel for T M Bhagalpur University, for taking instructions with regard to delay caused in payment, prayed for a short adjournment. In view thereof, as prayed for by learned counsel for T M Bhagalpur University, the matter be listed on 10th December, 2020, among the top five cases.”
5. Today, learned counsel for the University submitted that a second supplementary counter affidavit, bringing on record factual aspects relating to payments made to the petitioner of his admissible dues, had been filed. He drew the attention of the Court to paragraphs no. 5 and 6 of the said affidavit, which read as under:
“5. That in compliance of order dated 11.11.2020 passed by this Hon’ble Court, the respondent University is furnishing following facts on the point of delay in making payments to the Petitioner, to assist this Hon’ble Court to reach at a reasoned conclusion.
a. That Sri Ram Bilash Singh, the petitioner herein, had superannuated from his service on 30.09.2009.
b. That subsequent to the retirement of the petitioner, the service book of the petitioner for fixation of pension was sent to the University, on 17.04.2013 which was received by the University on 24.04.2013.
c. That the payment of pension and gratuity of the petitioner was started with effect from January, 2014.
d. That the regulation regarding extending of benefits of ACP /MACP was issued by the Governor’s Secretariat vide letter bearing No. Memo B.A.U41/2013-429/Ra San (1) dated 04.03.2014.
e. That it is further stated that after issuance of regulation by the Governor Secretariat, Patna, the case of the petitioner along with other employees was put before the Screening Committee and thereafter pursuant to its recommendation, the file of the petitioner along with other employees were processed for issuance of notification/office order.
f. That it is submitted that subsequent to this, direction with respect to extending of benefit of ACP/MACP to the petitioner and other employees was issued vide office order No.242/18 dated 28.02.2018.
g. That after the approval by the Pay Fixation Committee of the University, the pay fixation of the petitioner was done.
h. Finally the payment of difference of pension, gratuity, salary
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.