Back
MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Lakshaman Kishor Son of Late Basgit Bhagat – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The aforesaid two writ petitions have been heard together with consent of the parties since the issues to be adjudicated in the said cases are the same, hence are being disposed off by the present common judgment.
2. The aforesaid two writ petitions have been filed seeking a direction upon the respondents to apply the pension scheme and grant pension and other pensionary benefits in accordance with Bihar Pension Rules to the petitioners.
3. The petitioners of the first case have also prayed for quashing of the order contained in Memo No. 2621 dated 17.09.1983 issued by the Regional Development Commissioner-cum-Chairman, Sone Command Area Development Agency, Patna, whereby and whereunder the concerned authorities of the Agency have been directed to maintain the contributory provident fund accounts of the employees of the Sone Command Area Development Agency.
4. The facts not in dispute are that the petitioners had been appointed on different posts in the year 1975 or thereafter with the Sone Command Area Development Agency, which had subsequently stood merged with the Water and Land Management Institute (herein after referred to as the "WALMI") in the month of September, 2018
Pension scheme-petitioners having admittedly received the entire CPF amount along with the due interest without any demur or protest, upon their retirement, they cannot be permitted to retract now at....
The Odisha Development Authorities (Retirement Benefit of the Employees) Rules, 2015 are declared ultra vires, affirming the right of employees appointed prior to 01.01.2005 to receive pension benefi....
Court directed state authorities to expeditiously decide long-pending claims of daily wagers regularized post-2003 for switch to Old GPF/pension scheme from New CPF/NPS, deprecating delay without mer....
The decision to withhold a pension under Rule 43(a) of the Pension Rule should be based on future conduct, and if based on past conduct, Rule 43(b) should be invoked instead.
Employees of an autonomous body functioning as an instrumentality of the State are entitled to coverage under the Old Pension Scheme upon its merger into a government institute, as the denial of such....
An amendment with retrospective operation that takes away a benefit already available to the employee under the existing rule violates the rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constituti....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
