ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH, PARTHA SARTHY
Amar Dev Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ashwani Kumar Singh, J. - By the present application, the petitioner seeks review of the order of the Division Bench dated 23.03.2021 passed in CWJC No.8106 of 2021 by which the writ petition of the petitioner has been dismissed.
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-
(a) The Bihar Public Service Commission issued Advertisement No.4 of 2020 on 09.03.2020 inviting applications from eligible candidates for participating in the 31st Bihar Judicial Services (Preliminary) Competitive Examination for consideration of their cases for appointment against a total number of 221 seats of Civil Judge (Junior Division) in different categories as indicated under the said advertisement.
(b) Clause-4(ka) of the aforesaid Advertisement No.4 of 2020 dated 09.03.2020 prescribed that in terms of the provisions contained under notification dated 08.05.2008 bearing Notification No.4923 issued by the Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department of the State Government, in the event of submission of application by a large number of candidates, a Preliminary Tests in the form of Multiple Objective Choice Test would be conducted by the Commission and candidates equal to ten times the numbe
Lily Thomas vs. Union of India
Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde vs. Millikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale
Point of Law : Practice of calling for answer scripts/answer sheets and thereafter to order re-evaluation and that too in absence of any specific provision in relevant rules for re-evaluation and tha....
Judicial review of examination answer keys is limited; courts should not interfere unless errors are clear and demonstrable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.