SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 596

SAMEER JAIN
Prema Ram Patel S/o Bheema Ram Patel – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R. N. Mathur, Sr. Advocate with, Mr. Shovit Jhajharia, Mr. Ankit Kumar &, Mr. Utkarsh Dubey, Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma, Mr. Nikhil Kumawat with, Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with, Mr. Aamir Khan & Mr. Gopesh Kumar, Mr. Suresh Khileri, Mr. Vigyan Shah with, Mr. Harendra Neel, Mr. Srijan Tiwari for, Mr. Ram Mohan Sharma, Ms. Komal Kumari Giri, Mr. Rajaram Choudhary, Mr. Dhoop Singh Poonia, Mr. Tushar Panwar, Mr. Rakesh Prajapt, Ms. Neha Godara, Mr. S. K. Tank, Mr. Ravindra Singh Shekhawat, Mr. A. R. Meena, Mr. R. K. Bairwa, Mr. V. K. Rathore, Mr. H. K. Sharma, Mr. Ajay Choudhary
For the Respondent: Mr. S. S. Raghav, AAG, Mr. Yuvraj Samant with, Ms. Neha Amola, Mr. Neeraj Meena, Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, IAS, Chief Examination Controller, RPSC

ORDER :

Sameer Jain, J.

1. In the present batch of writ petitions, the scope of the controversy involved, albeit not limited to but is broadly and predominantly defined by the challenge raised regarding the correctness and/or validity of the final answer key dated 20.10.2023, as issued by the respondent-Rajasthan Public Service Commission (hereinafter, RPSC), pursuant to the invitation of objection(s) from the applicants/candidates as against the model answer key published on 01.10.2023. Therefore, considering the fact that the writ petitions warrant adjudication on common questions of law; with the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the parties, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18130/2023 titled as Prema Ram Patel and Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors, is being taken up as the lead case. It is cautiously clarified that any discrepancies in the present batch of writ petitions, pertain purely to the factual narratives contained therein and not viz-a-viz the questions of law to be determined by this Court.

2. The overarching factual matrix, enveloping the lis to be determined by this Court, is concisely noted herein-under:-

2.1 On 28.06.2023, the respondent-RPSC issued a

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
              whatsapp-icon Back to top