IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Mohit Kumar Shah, J.
Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh - Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15096 of 2018
Decided On : 06-08-2021
Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 – Sections 18(4)(ii), 20(2) and (5) and 44 – Bihar Panchayat Raj Institution (Conduct of Business) Rules, 2015 – Rule 5 and Rule 6(1) – Direction to attend special meeting of Panchayat for consideration of No-Confidence Motion against petitioner – One third members of Panchayat had rightly convened special meeting since Mukhiya had failed to convene special meeting, as provided for under Sub-Section (5) of Section 20 of Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 and had also rightly required Panchayat Secretary to give a notice to members, which Panchayat Secretary had duly honoured by issuing a notice – On this score, there is no illegality – Reason has definitely been mentioned in all requisitions – Mukhiya and the Up-Mukhiya had locked office of Gram Panchayat and were absconding on account of a criminal case having been lodged against them, hence, meeting could not be held at office of Gram Panchayat, but was held at an independent and neutral place – Provision contained in Section 18(4)(ii) of Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 does not specifically bar conduct of special meeting at a place other than office of Gram Panchayat and same only postulates that Mukhiya shall convene a special meeting of Gram Panchayat in office of Gram Panchayat, meaning thereby that said bar is not applicable/mandatory when other members call a special meeting, in case the Mukhiya fails to convene special meeting – Writ Petition dismissed. (Paras 10, 11, 14 and 15)
JUDGMENT
Mohit Kumar Shah, J. - The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the notice dated 26.07.2018, issued by the Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Gobind Chak, Block-Sonepur, District-Saran at Chapra i.e. the Respondent No. 7 herein whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been informed to attend the special meeting of the Panchayat to be held on 02.08.2018, which has been convened for consideration of No Confidence Motion against the petitioner.
2. The short facts of the case are that the petitioner had won the election of ward member of the Gram Panchayat Raj, Gobind Chak and was elected as the Up-Mukhiya of the said Gram Panchayat. The case of the petitioner is that in order to remove the petitioner in an illegal manner, a requisition signed by some ward members of the said Panchayat was submitted to the Respondent No. 7 to convene a special meeting of the Panchayat for consideration of the No Confidence Motion against the petitioner. Thereafter, the Panchayat Secretary had approached the Respondent No. 5 i.e. the Block Development Officer, Sonepur, District-Saran at Chapra and on his direction, the Panchayat Secretary had fixed the date of special meeting for consideration of the No Confidence Motion against the petitioner on 02.08.2018, whereafter notices were issued to the petitioner and all other ward members of the Panchayat vide letter dated 26.07.2018, regarding holding of the meeting on 02.08.2018.
3. It appears that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the special meeting had been held on 02.08.2018 in which a No Confidence Motion was passed against the petitioner and he has been removed from the post of Up-Mukhiya, which though has been challenged by filing an interlocutory application bearing I.A. No. 6244 of 2018, however, this Court has not allowed the said interlocutory application and in fact, the learned counsel for the petitioner has also not pressed it at the time of final arguments.
4. Nonetheless, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted by referring to Section 18(4)(ii) of the Bihar Panchyat Raj Act, 2006 that firstly, the Mukhiya of the concerned Gram Panchayat has to convene a special meeting for the purposes of consideration of No Confidence Motion and secondly, the meeting has to be convened in the office of the Gram Panchyat. At this juncture, it would be relevant to reproduce Section 18(4)(ii) of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 herein below:-
"18(4)(ii). Removal of Up-Mukhiya by no confidence motion-Every Up-Mukhiya shall be deemed to have vacated his office forthwith if a resolution expressing want of confidence in him is passed by a simple majority of the total number of elected members of the Gram Panchayat and Mukhiya at a meeting especially convened for the purpose. The requisition for such a special meeting shall be signed by not less than one third of the total number of elected members of the Gram Panchayat and shall be delivered to the Mukhiya. The Mukhiya shall, within 7 days from the date of receipt of the requisition, convene a special meeting of the Gram Panchayat in the office of the Gram Panchayat for discussion on the motion and shall also preside over the meeting :
Provided that during the first two year period of the tenure, no such motion of no confidence shall be moved against the Up-Mukhiya. 1 [Such a no confidence motion may be brought only once in the whole tenure of Up-Mukhiya.]:
[Second Proviso deleted vide Sec. 7 of Amdt. Act 15 of 2015]
Provided further that no motion of no confidence against Up-Mukhiya shall be brought during the last six months before the expiry of the term of Gram Panchayat.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has taken this Court through the documents, annexed to the counter affidavit, to show that the requisition regarding No Confidence Motion was submitted by one third members of the Panchayat before the Block Development Officer, Sonepur, Saran at Chapra on 14.07.2018, whereafter another requisition
The court upheld the validity of the no confidence motion requisition under the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, confirming the necessity for clear allegations and the petitioner's failure to disclose key fa....
The court affirmed that a second No Confidence Motion is permissible if the first requisition did not lead to a valid meeting or vote, as per the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006.
Point of Law : Duty of the Chairman/Vice-Chairman to face the no-confidence motion, as they were elected office-bearers and if they had lost the confidence of the majority to continue as such office-....
Section 15(1) of Panchayat Act categorically mandates that there should be service of notice of no confidence motion upon President by Secretary thereby giving him 15 clear days.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.