IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
Hifjur Rahman Laskar, S/o. Jalal Uddin Laskar – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam, rep. by The Principal Secretary To The Govt. Of Assam, And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.338 Of 2023
Decided On : 11-05-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 - Section 6[1][b], [3], 15[1], 13[1] - Assam Panchayat [Financial Rules], 2002 - Rule 5, 17[3], 18 - Gaon Panchayat - Special meeting - No confidence motion - Petition assailing Minutes of a special meeting held in office to discuss a motion of no confidence brought against petitioner as President on basis of a requisition notice – Held, Special meetings were not properly held and on two of three occasions, a resolution was passed against petitioner by more than requisite two-third majority of total number of Ward Members of a Gaon Panchayat, but interfered with later on, Court is of view that a direction is called for in case in hand because motion of no confidence is not lost and still survives - Secretary and Executive Officer of Algapur Anchalik Panchayat shall ensure that entire proceedings of special meeting is videographed and there shall be no outsiders other than petitioner, Ward Members of Gaon Panchayat, President and Secretary of Algapur Anchalik Panchayat and deputed Gazetted Officer and other required Government officials - Petitioner as President of Gaon Panchayat and respondent nos. 7 – 15 as Ward Members of Gaon Panchayat are directed to participate in special meeting - If there is any other Ward Member of Gaon Panchayat who is not a party in present proceedings, respondent no. 4 shall ensure service of notice in respect of special meeting upon him - Special meeting has been interfered with, as a corollary, petitioner will continue in post of President - Petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
1. The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been instituted by the petitioner assailing the Minutes of a special meeting held, at 02-30 p.m. on 12.01.2023, in the office of Algapur Anchalik Panchayat to discuss a motion of no confidence brought against the petitioner as the President of No. 1 North Narainpur Gaon Panchayat on the basis of a requisition notice submitted by 9 [nine] nos. of Ward Members on 02.06.2022 expressing want of confidence in the petitioner to continue as the President of No. 1 North Narainpur Gaon Panchayat and requesting the respondent no. 6 i.e. the Secretary, No. 1 North Narainpur Gaon Panchayat to convene a special meeting. The petitioner has also sought for a direction in the nature of mandamus to the respondent authorities to reinstate the petitioner as the President of No. 1 North Narainpur Gaon Panchayat and to allow him to exercise all the powers and to perform all the functions and duties of the President of North Narainpur Gaon Panchayat.
2. At the inception, it is apt to mention that there are several rounds of previous litigations as regards the matter of no confidence motion subsequent to submission of the requisition notice dated 02.06.2022 and it appears necessary to have a narration on the sequence of events that took place on and from 02.06.2022 up to 12.01.2023.
3. In the General Panchayat Election held in the year 2018, the petitioner contested for the post of President of No. 1 North Narainpur Gaon Panchayat. In the General Panchayat Election so held, the petitioner got elected to the post of President of No. 1 North Narainpur Gaon Panchayat [hereinafter also referred as ‘the Gaon Panchayat’, at places, for convenience] as per the provisions of Section 6[1][b] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, as amended. In the said General Panchayat Election, the respondent nos. 7 – 15 also got themselves elected as Ward Members of the Goan Panchayat. Apart from the respondent nos. 7 – 15, there is another Ward Member who also got elected as a Ward Member from one of the 10 [ten] Wards under the Gaon Panchayat. No. 1 North Narainpur Gaon Panchayat consists of 10 nos. of Ward Members. After the Election, the respondent no. 15 got elected as the Vice-President of the Gaon Panchayat in terms of the provisions of Section 6[3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, as amended.
3.1. On 02.06.2022, 9 [nine] nos. of Ward Members of the Gaon Panchayat submitted a requisition notice addressing the same to the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat, that is, the respondent no. 6 expressing want of confidence in the President of the Gaon Panchayat i.e. the petitioner and sought for convening of a special meeting to discuss the motion of no confidence. By the requisition notice dated 02.06.2022, 9 [nine] nos. of Ward Members also requested the respondent no. 6 to notify the time, date and venue of the special meeting to be convened. On receipt of the requisition notice dated 02.06.2022, the respondent no. 6 stated to have brought the said requisition notice to the knowledge of the petitioner on 04.06.2022. According to the petitioner, he had put his comments on the file asking the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat to wait so that he could discuss the matter and take necessary steps as per the provisions of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994. It transpires that the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat had thereafter, referred the requisition notice containing the matter of no confidence motion to the President, Algapur Anchalik Panchayat on 16.06.2022. On receipt of the letter dated 16.06.2022 from the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat, the President of Algapur Anchalik Panchayat issued a notice to the stakeholders convening a special meeting to discuss the motion of no confidence against the petitioner on 22.06.2022.
3.2. Assailing such convening of the special meeting by the President of Algapur Anchalik Panchayat on 22.06.2022 to discuss the motion of no confidence against him, the petitioner inst
The Notice for the special meeting was found to be in violation of the statutory prescription of 3 clear days' notice as per Section 17[3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994.
Point of Law : Section 17 [3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 has clearly stipulated that in case of any special meeting [which is a meeting for no confidence motion], 3 [three] days' clear notice h....
By Clause [4] of Article 243C, right to vote in meeting of Panchayat has been made limited to Chairperson of a Panchayat and other members of a Panchayat whether or not chosen by direct election from....
Point of Law : Process subsequent to requisition notices expressing want of confidence had failed finally either on technical grounds or due to procedural irregularities, this Court, thus, is of the ....
Point of Law : Duty of the Chairman/Vice-Chairman to face the no-confidence motion, as they were elected office-bearers and if they had lost the confidence of the majority to continue as such office-....
Point of Law : Waiver is a question of conduct and can be determined on the facts and circumstances of each case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.