Pawan Kumar vs Union Of India - 2021 Supreme(Pat) 517

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Pat) 517

VIKASH JAIN, ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Dinu Kumar, Advocate, Ms. Ritika Rani, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Nishi Nath Ojha, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Vikash Jain, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents through video conference.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner hereby undertakes that all defects pointed out by the stamp reporter shall be removed, and compliance with the conditions of the notices of this Court with regard to acceptance of e-filing shall be made, without delay immediately upon resumption of normal physical functioning of the Court, and in any event within one month thereof.

3. The following reliefs as formulated by the petitioner have been claimed in the writ petition.

"A. For quashing order dated No. 172 dated 1-10-2018 passed by Learned member judicial Central Administrative Tribunal CAT in Patna O.A. No. 50/00399/2017 as contained in Annexure-7 by which appointment on compassionate ground after death of father Late Dileshwar posted as Technician in Grade-III, Gajhandi has been rejected.

(B) And also for quashing order dated 9.11.2015 issued by Senior Divisional EC Railway Dhanbad as contained in Annexure 5 by which petitioner was not appointed on compassionate ground on the ground there is a dispute regarding actual widow of late Dileshwar, EX Technician T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document