ANSHUMAN
Binod Kumar, Son of Phekan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANSHUMAN, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned Counsel for the Bihar State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. (BELTRON).
2. The petitioners have prayed for the following relief/s :-
(ii) To issue an appropriate writ order direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order issued through memo no. 1382 dated 31.07.2019 issued under the signature of OSD, Society whereunder against the newly sanctioned post of Executive Assistant under the Society will be filled through Beltron against the available vacancy of the Executive Assistant in the concerned district and further directed to mak
State of U.P. Vs. Ram Swarup Saroj reported in (2000) 3 SCC 699
Ramesh Chandra Sankla Vs. Vikram Cement reported in (2008) 14 SCC 58
The court established that while inclusion in a merit list does not guarantee appointment, any deviation from established recruitment processes must be justified and cannot be arbitrary, ensuring com....
An order passed without assigning any reason is bad in law and cannot be sustained.
Select list placement confers no indefeasible right to appointment; State may reduce provisional vacancies bona fide without arbitrariness.
Recruiting agency cannot unilaterally cancel reserve panel despite user department's substitution request for unfilled vacancy; next meritorious candidate entitled to appointment consideration with n....
Arbitrary denial of opportunity by recruitment agency violates constitutional rights of applicants when justified reasons for non-appointment are missing.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.