IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.
Ram Nawmi Sharma - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar & Ors. - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3323 of 2019
Decided On : 05-07-2021
Service Law – Pay Scale – Petitioner is claiming determination of his retiral benefits in terms of pension, gratuity and cash equivalent to unutilized earned leave – Petitioner who was working as Accountant – It is not the case of State of Bihar that petitioner did not fulfill qualification of post of Accountant in a College – In agreement arrived at between Federation and State Government, it was agreed upon that post of Head Assistant and Accountant of Colleges should be designated as Section Officer at departmental level – It was also agreed that pay-scale of Rs.5500-9000 should be granted to Assistants of Colleges and University – It will not be permissible for respondents to grant lower pay-scale to persons who were holding post of Head Assistants and Accountant upon their redesignation as Section Officer than same granted to Assistants of Colleges and Universities – Stand taken on behalf of State Government is wholly illogical, completely arbitrary and discriminatory – Merely because there was no reference relating to pay-scale to be granted to Accountants upon their re-designation as Section Officers, they could be placed in lower pay-scale than that of Assistants is based apparently on irrelevant consideration – In no circumstance, a State within meaning of Article 12 of Constitution of India can be permitted to pay a section of its employees less than those who are lower in rank – Hierarchy of service is one of important factors for determining pay-scale, which a post should carry – A post, which was carrying higher pay-scale and was re-designated as Section Officer in light of the decision in case of Sunny Prakash [(2013) 3 SCC 559) cannot be placed in a pay-scale less than that of Assistant – Action of respondents is in utter violation of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of India – Impugned action is arbitrarily illegal, capricious and unsustainable – Respondents directed to calculate petitioner's entitlements accordingly treating his pay-scale as on 01.01.1996 as Rs. 5500-9000 – Respondents directed to calculate differential amount against various heads, consequent upon grant of pay-scale of Rs.5500-9000 and ensure that all payment are made to petitioner within a period of three months – Writ Application allowed with cost of Rs. 20,000/-. (Paras 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17)
JUDGMENT
1. This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.
2. In order to appreciate the context in which the petitioner has filed the present writ application seeking relief in the main application as well as by way of amendment in relief through LA. No. 01 of 2021, it would be appropriate to take note of certain facts emerging from the pleadings on record which are not in dispute and are just for adjudication.
3. The petitioner was appointed as an Upper Division Clerk on 20.08.1973 and as an Accountant on 01.01.1983 in Women's College, Samastipur District, which is presently a constituent unit of L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga. On attaining the age of superannuation, he retired w.e.f. 31.12.2011.
4. The Education Department, Government of Bihar vide G.O. dated 25.02.1987 had declared non-teaching staff of the Universities and constituent Colleges equivalent to government staff. It appears that in protest against non-fulfillment of certain demands regarding claim of the non-teaching employees of the Universities in the State of Bihar, a Federation of associations of employees of constituent Colleges of the Universities had gone on strike. The dispute, however, was resolved with an agreement reached between the Federation of associations and the State Government, which was communicated to all the Vice Chancellors of the Universities of the State for necessary action. For non-implementation of the said agreement, the non-teaching employees again resorted to strike whereafter an understanding was arrived at between the Federation and the Government of Bihar. As the agreement was not being implemented, the employees again went on strike on 01.07.2007, which led to complete disruption of educational activities in the Colleges and the Universities of Bihar.
A meeting was subsequently held between the representatives of the Federation and the Government of Bihar and an agreement/understanding was again arrived at on 17.07.2007 and a proceeding was accordingly drawn on 18.07.2007. Items 3, 4 and 5 of the said understanding are relevant for the present adjudication, which read as under :-
3. Facility of ACP may be given to the employees.
4. Head Assistant and Accountant of the Colleges may be designated as Section Officer at the departmental level.
5. Pay scale of Rs. 5500-9000 may be granted to the Assistants of Colleges and university.
5. Non-implementation of the agreement/understanding arrived at on 18.07.2007 was not being implemented by the authorities which resulted into yet another indefinite strike of non-teaching staff of the Universities. Complaining continuous disruption of teaching work in the Colleges and the Universities in the State of Bihar, a student namely, Sunny Prakash addressed a letter to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of this Court with a request to intervene to end the strike in public interest. The letter was treated as a Public Interest Litigation by this Court giving rise to C.W.J.C. No. 10870 of 2008. A Division Bench of this Court in case of State of Bihar and Another v. Sunny Prakash and Others passed an interim order dated 07.08.2008 directing the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar to ensure that the commitment given by the State Government to Bihar State University and College Employees Federation was honored and implemented within one month from the date of the said order. The State of Bihar preferred Special Leave Petition registered as SLP (C) No. 22617 of 2008 before the Supreme Court which gave rise to Civil Appeal No. 516 of 2013 in case of State of Bihar and Another v. Sunny Prakash and Others. The Supreme Court upon examining various aspects of the issues involved disposed of the said Civil Appeal No. 516 of 2013 reported in (2013) 3 SCC 559 with following observation and direction:-
"21. In the case on hand, we have already demonstrated various communications issued by the Government for implementation of the earlier decision. In such circumstance, we have n
State of Bihar and Another v. Sunny Prakash and Others. (2013) 3 SCC 559
Legal entitlement to pay scales depends on prescribed qualifications, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles in administrative decisions.
The Pay Verification Cell lacks authority to unilaterally modify pay scales set by statutory committees, affirming the jurisdiction of University committees in pay fixation.
Points Of Law : Any amounts paid to appellants under order of the Principal dated or even under the order of learned Single Judge (if any) will not be sought to be recovered from appellants.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioner to equal pay as those in similar posts in government-run educational institutions, as advocated by the recommenda....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.