Back
P. B. BAJANTHRI, RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Surendra Prasad Yadav S/o Late Tapsi Prasad Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P.B. BAJANTHRI, J.
1. Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:
(ii) The order passed in Appeal by the Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur in Service Appeal No. 91 of 2019 dated 20.09.2019 by which the order of the Collector, dismissing the petitioner from service has been approved, be also quashed.
(iii) The necessary direction be issued to reinstate the petitioner on his post from where he was dismissed with back wages with all consequential benefits.
(iv) The necessary cost be awarded, for the harassment caused of the petitioner.
(v) Any other relief/reliefs also be guaranteed, which this Hon’ble Court may seems fit and proper.
(vi) It is further prayed that during the pendency of the present application the operation of the order passed by the Collector approved by the Commissioner be stayed.”
3. Petitioner while working as Revenue Karamchari under the Collectorate of Bettiah, West Champaran was subjected to discipli
The disciplinary and appellate authorities must consider the petitioner's contentions in the proceedings and address them in their orders to ensure reasoned decisions and application of mind.
The disciplinary and appellate authorities must consider the petitioner's contentions and apply their minds when passing orders. The entitlement to back wages is discretionary and should be determine....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
