Abinash Chandra vs State of Bihar - 2022 Supreme(Pat) 837

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Pat) 837

P. B. BAJANTHRI
Abinash Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Nikhil Kumar Agrawal.
For the Respondents: M/s Binodji Verma, Dhruba Mukherjee, Raj Kishore Roy.

P. B. Bajanthri, J.—Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.

2. In the instant petition, petitioners have prayed for the following relief/reliefs:—

“i. To issue an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 20.05.2016 as contained in memo no. 802 dated 24.05.2016 (Annexure – 5) whereby and whereunder the services of the Petitioners were terminated abruptly and illegally.

ii. To issue an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 20.06.2016 as contained in memo no. 1525 dated 25.06.2016 (Annexure – 9) whereby the services of the Petitioners has been terminated which is wholly based on order dated 24.05.2016.

iii. To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioners into service and pay all consequential benefits legally admissible to them.

iv. To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondents to produce the entire service record of the Petitioners which would show that the Petitioners have been working continuously without any back or blemish.

v. To any