Back
P. B. BAJANTHRI
Dinesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
P. B. Bajanthri, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief/reliefs:—
“(i) Issuance of a direction, order or writ, including writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 09.05.2017 passed by the Appellate Authority-cum-Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, Patna, by which the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order of punishment contained in Memo No. 7350 dated 24.05.2016 passed by the disciplinary authority, by which the punishment of dismissal from service has been inflicted upon the petitioner has been rejected;
(ii) Issuance of direction, order or writ, including writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 24.05.2016 bearing Memo No. 7350 issued by the concerned authorities under the General Administration Department of the State Government, by which the punishment of dismissal from service has been inflicted upon the petitioner in terms of the provisions contained under rule 14 (xi) of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 2005;
(iii) Issuance of a direction, order or writ, including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the concerned resp
The disciplinary and appellate authorities must consider the petitioner's contentions in the proceedings and address them in their orders to ensure reasoned decisions and application of mind.
The disciplinary and appellate authorities must consider the petitioner's contentions and apply their minds when passing orders. The entitlement to back wages is discretionary and should be determine....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
