SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 1007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PATNA
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH, J.
Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Kumar Yadav - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar And Others - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 25572 of 2019
Decided on : 04-02-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.Karandeep Kumar,
For the Respondent: Mr.Arvind Ujjwal, adv

Headnote:

Essential Commodities Act, 1955 – Section 7 – Petition for release of seized vehicle – No confiscation proceeding is going on in respect of seized vehicle – District Collector directed to take a decision in the matter in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from date of receipt of this order – If seized vehicle needs to be confiscated, then District Collector shall initiate a proceeding for confiscation and, depending upon result of such proceeding decision as regards release or otherwise of seized vehicle may be taken – If District Collector decides not to initiate any confiscation proceeding in respect of seized vehicle, he shall communicate his decision to jurisdictional Judicial Magistrate. (Paras 5 and 7)

Order dated 13.05.2016 passed in Cr. WJC No. 246 of 2016 – Referred.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks release of his pick-up van bearing Registration No. BR05GA8629 which was seized in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 130 of 2018 under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

3. Brief facts of this case is that on 21.08.2018, Block Development Officer-cum-Block Supply Officer, Tetaria, East Champaran gave a written report and the same was treated as First Information Report being Rajepur PS Case No. 130 of 2018 and registered under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

4. Prosecution case in brief is that informant got secret information that at the house of petitioner, one pick-up van loaded with government foodgrains is likely to be black-marketed. On such information, raid was conducted and with the help police party one loaded pick-up van bearing Registration No. BR05GA8629 having 37 bags of rice was seized.

5. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the confiscation proceeding has not been initiated as yet nor any decision have been taken to initiate the same. It is further submitted that petitioner gave an application for release of the vehicle in question before the Court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. In pursuance thereof, vide letter dated 07.06.2019 as contained in letter no. 2040/legal, it was reported that no confiscation proceeding is going on in respect of vehicle in question. It is further submitted that this application regarding release of vehicle may be disposed of in view of ratio laid down in the case of (Bablu Kumar Das Vs. State of Bihar) vide order dated 13.05.2016 passed in Cr.WJC No. 246 of 2016 whereby the Hon'ble Court was pleased to dispose of the matter with certain direction.

6. Counsel for the State raised no objection.

7. In view of the submission of petitioner this writ petition is also disposed of in terms of order dated 13.05.2016 passed in Cr.WJC No. 246 of 2016 in case of (Bablu Kumar Das Vs. State of Bihar).

8. This writ application is partly allowed. The District Collector, East Champaran at Motihari, is hereby directed to take a decision in the matter in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. If the seized vehicle needs to be confiscated, then the District Collector shall initiate a proceeding for confiscation and, depending upon the result of the proceeding, which may be so drawn, a decision as regards release or otherwise of the seized vehicle may be taken. If the District Collector decides not to initiate any confiscation proceeding in respect of the seized vehicle, he shall communicate his decision to the jurisdictional Judicial Magistrate, who would, thereafter, stand vested with the power to direct release of the seized vehicle if the facts and circumstances of the case so warrant.

9. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top