IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.K.PATTANAIK
Samir Rajan Parida – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context of the petition regarding vehicle release. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments of petitioner and respondent on vehicle custody. (Para 3 , 7) |
| 3. court's reasoning based on section 6-e of the e.c. act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. supreme court interpretations on jurisdictional limits. (Para 8) |
| 5. conclusion of dismissal of the petition. (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT :
R.K. PATTANAIK, J.
1. The petitioner by filing the instant petition has questioned the correctness and judicial propriety of impugned order dated 17th June, 2022 under Annexure-2 passed in Criminal Revision No. 10 of 2022 by the learned Sessions Judge, Keonjhar for having confirmed the order dated 8th March, 2022 passed in CMC No.412 of 2021 by the learned S.D.J.M., Keonjhar, who rejected an application under Section 457 Cr.P.C. vis-a-vis release of a vehicle seized in connection with Keonjhar Sadar P.S. Case No.449 dated 29th October, 2021 corresponding to G.R. Case No.1777 of 2021 registered under Sections 379 , 420 read with 34 IPC and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (herein after referred to as ‘the E.C. Act’) on the ground that the same is not tenable in law.
2. The vehicle in question bearing registra
State of West Bengal and others Vs. Sujit Kumar Rana
Sambhu Dayal Agarwala Vs. State of West Bengal and another
Deputy Commissioner, Dakshina Kannada District Vs. Rudolph Fernadez
A court lacks jurisdiction to order the release of a seized vehicle when confiscation proceedings are pending as per Section 6-E of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
The court established that an application for release of a seized vehicle during the pendency of confiscation proceedings under Section 6A of The Essential Commodities Act is not maintainable before ....
An application for release of a seized vehicle under Section 451 Cr.P.C. during pendency of confiscation proceedings under Section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act is not maintainable before the M....
Special Acts like The Essential Commodities Act prevail over general provisions of Cr.P.C. regarding confiscation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the lower courts must determine their own jurisdiction under Section 457 Cr.P.C. to release a seized vehicle during pending confiscation proce....
The court acknowledged that vehicles seized in NDPS cases should not be retained indefinitely, establishing guidelines for interim release to prevent deterioration and ensure lawful ownership.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the jurisdiction of the trial court to make any order about the custody of conveyance is ceased only after it has received intimation about th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.