RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
RAJGRIHI SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.
1. Matter has been heard at length.
2. The petitioner has preferred this writ application for issuance of an appropriate writs, orders or directions to the respondents to make the payments of entire pensionary benefits i.e. Pension, Gratuity the amount of G.P.F. Insurance and Leave Encashment with the statutory interest @ 10% per annum till the date of payment since the petitioner has already superannuated on 31.01.2016 from the post of Storekeeper of the Department of Chemistry of the respondent No. 6 but not a single penny has been paid.
3. It is the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was duly appointed by the Vice Chancellor of the University in accordance with the provisions of Section 10(6) of the Bihar Universities Act, 1976. It is submitted that the petitioner served lastly in the Jawahar Lal Nehru College, Dehri-on-Sone, Rohtas (hereinafter referred to as 'College in question') and retired after about 38 years of service. He retired from service in the year 2016 and till the date of his retirement no proceeding was initiated against him. It is only after his retirement from service when he was looking for his
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.