SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 916

PRABHAT KUMAR JHA
Saryu Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Accountant General – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ajay Kumar.
For the Respondent: Mr. Rewati Kant Raman, AC, Mr. S.M. Ehtesham.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rewati Kant Raman, the learned AC to SC11 and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General.

2. The petitioner by filing this writ petition seeks following reliefs:

For a direction to the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna to revise the pension of the petitioner after granting 1st ACP and 2nd ACP duly sanctioned by the Chief Engineer through the office order dated 02.02.2007 and further to direct the Account General not to slash down the pension of the petitioner from the scale of Rs.3050/- to Rs.4590/- to Rs.2650/- to Rs.4000/- without affording any opportunity to the petitioner. The petitioner further seeks direction to the Accountant General, Bihar to issue fresh PPO in pursuance of the order dated 02.02.2007 (Annexure-3) by which the Chief Engineer duly sanctioned the grant of 1st ACP and 2nd ACP to the petitioner in the next scale of Rs.3050/- to Rs.4590/- and further direct to make payment of interest.

3. During the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner filed LA. No.1 of 2019 with a prayer for quashing the impugned order dated 10.04.2019 and 15.04.2019 (Annexure-14 series),

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top