SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 265

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH, HARISH KUMAR, JJ.
The State of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Balram Singh @ Baliram Singh @ Munna, Son of Late Shyam Narayan Singh – Respondent
Death Reference No.8 of 2021, Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 591 of 2021
Decided on : 09-05-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Xxxxx
For the Respondent: Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Ms. Anukriti Jaipuriar, Amicus Curiae

Headnote:

Constitution of India – Article 21 – Right to fair trial – A trial primarily aimed at ascertaining truth has to be fair to all concerned, which includes accused, victims and society at large – Each person has right to be dealt with fairly in a criminal trial – Denial of a fair trial amounts to injustice not only to accused but also to victim and society – Accused has right to fair trial under our Constitution as also international treaties and conventions, right to get fair trial is considered as a basic human right – Denial of fair trial is like crucifixion of human rights – Right of fair trial in spirit of right to life and personal liberty is paramount right enshrined under Article 21 of Constitution and at no point of time pursuit of expeditious disposal of trial, trial court can sacrifice basic tenet of criminal jurisprudence i.e., "the cause of justice". (Paras 22 and 23)

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – Sections 5/6 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302, 201, 376-AB – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 304 – Rape and murder of girl child – Disappearance of evidence – Death sentence – Court does not find any order, which reflects that at any point of time, Lawyer engaged on behalf of accused-appellant has been provided any basic documents or sufficient time to had advantage of any discussion or interaction with accused-appellant – Direction for de-novo trial of accused-appellant from stage of framing of charge – Impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence set aside and matter remanded to Trial Court with a specific direction that Exclusive Special Court would provide appellant a legal aid counsel if appellant is unable to engage an Advocate of his choice – Trial Court shall ensure that such legal aid counsel is provided to appellant before framing of charge till its conclusion – Death reference rejected. (Paras 19, 24 and 25)

JUDGMENT :

HARISH KUMAR, J.

Heard Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 591 of 2021, as also Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur and Ms. Anukriti Jaipuriar, learned counsel, appointed as Amicus Curiae to assist the Court in Death Reference No. 08 of 2021 and Mr. Dr. Mayanand Jha, learned APP for the State.

2. The present death reference and the connected Cr. Appeal arise out of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 26.07.2021 and 30.07.2021 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-VII, Exclusive Special Court (POCSO), Rohtas at Sasaram in POCSO Case No. 68 of 2020, arising out of Dalmianagar (Dehri) P.S. Case No. 888 of 2020 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted under Sections 302, 201, 376-AB of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5/6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and sentenced to death to be hanged by neck till his last breath subject to confirmation of sentence by the High Court and also awarded fine of Rs.50,000/-under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. In case of default of payment of fine, the convict-appellant shall serve simple imprisonment for one year. The convict-appellant is further sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for five years for the offence under 201 of the Indian Penal Code and fine of Rs.10,000/-and in default of payment of fine, simple imprisonment for one year and further awarded sentence to undergo imprisonment for life for the remainder of natural life with fine of Rs.50,000/-under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and in default of payment of fine, Simple Imprisonment for one year. The learned trial court has not awarded any separate sentence for the charges under Section 376-AB of the Indian Penal Code. It is made clear that all the sentences shall run concurrently.

3. The prosecution case is based upon a written application filed by the grandmother of the victim to the SHO, Dalmianagar (Dehri) P.S. stating therein that when the informant (PW.-3) could not find her minor grand-daughter (X), aged about 10 years, at about 3.00 P.M. on 14.11.2020 (Depawali Festival Day) in the house, she started searching for her and also enquired from her co-villagers. At about 6.00 P.M. on the same day she got to know from co-villagers that her neighbour Balram Singh @ Baliram Singh @ Munna (appellant) was seen enticing her grand daughter with a calendar of Goddess Laxmi and Lord Ganesh and took her to his house. When the informant (P.W.-3) went to the house of Balram Singh @ Baliram Singh, she found the door locked, then she informed Dalimianagar police station. It is further alleged that co-villagers searched for appellant-convict Baliram Singh and caught him from Sahu Mohalla and brought to his house in the presence of Dalmianagar police. The lock of the house of appellant Baliram Singh was opened with the key by the police and the house was searched in front of every body. During the search, the dead body of the victim was found kept in a wooden box in a semi naked condition. The dead body bore blood stained injury mark on her neck and on the private part of the victim. The appellant confessed his guilt of committing rape and murder of informant’s grand daughter before every body.

The further case is that the police arrested the appellant Baliram Singh and prepared inquest report and took the body of the victim to Sadar Hospital, Sasaram for post-mortem examination.

4. On the basis of the aforesaid written application of the informant (P.W.-3), the First Information Report was drawn up and Dalmianagar (Dehri) P.S. Case No. 888 of 2020 dated 15.11.2020 has been registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376-A, 376-B, 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

5. The seized articles were sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Patna vide Memo No. 888 dated 25.11.2020 and the report of the FSL under the signature of Assistant Director, Forensic Science Laboratory, Government of

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top