SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, AMBUJ NATH
Vijay Ganjhu – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Awnish Shankar, Advocate
For the State: Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT

Heard Mr. Awnish Shankar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 04.10.2019 passed by Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh No. 1, learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Hazaribag in Sessions Trial No. 242A/2009, arising out of Chauparan P.S. Case No. 110/2006, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1880/2006, whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted for the offence u/s 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs. 50,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for 02 years.

3. The fardbeyan of Rohan Ganjhu was recorded on 09.07.2006 in which he has stated that on 08.07.2006 at about 7:50 P.M. his brother namely Khiru Ganjhu was sitting at the door of Chaman Ganjhu. The informant was proceeding towards his house when the accused Dhela Ganjhu, Vijay Ganjhu (appellant) Deoki Ganjhu, Binod Bhuiyan and Sitan Bhuiyan had arrived with Lathi and Danda in their hands. It has been alleged the Dhela Ganjhu pointedly referred to Khiru Ghanju and said that whenever

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top