SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Pat) 640

ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Ashwini Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Akhilesh Dutta Verma.
For the Respondent: Mr.Vivek Prasad.

ORDER

Heard the parties through the virtual court proceeding.

2. This application is for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to revoke the suspension of the petitioner which is continuing on an from 28.06.2016 by way of retrospective effect (Annexure-5) in the grab of Bihar Government (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rule 2005 under Rule-9(5) fro about 3 years and 5 months vide Memo No.2254 dated 28.06.2019 from the order of termination dated 28.06.2019 from the order of termination dated 28.06.2016 and also for payment of full consequential benefits from the date of termination i.e. 28.06.2016 in the light of order passed in C.W.J.C. No.610 of 2017 later on it was confirmed with certain modification in L.P.A. No.1123 of 2017 and for other writ/command/direction in the facts and circumstances of the case.

3. The fact in the writ petition is that the petitioner had joined the service on 08.09.1986 as an Assistant at Labour Employment Department, (Training Wing) and thereafter, qualified examination of Bihar Public Service Commission through proper channel and joined as Excise Inspector, Department of Excise on 29.05.1992 and thereafter got promoted

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top