Nirmal Kumar vs State of Bihar - 2022 Supreme(Pat) 306

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Pat) 306

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Nirmal Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s Y.V. Giri, Sr. Adv., Pranav Kumar (in 21397); Sharda Nand Mishra (in 7066); Ashish Giri (in 22833).
For the Respondent: M/s Madanjeet Kumar(in 21397); Smt.Binita Singh(in 7066); Prabhakar Jha.

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.:–All the writ petitions have come up for admission. Taking into consideration the nature of the case, both the counsels have agreed to argue the case finally. Accordingly, the case was heard finally at this stage.

2. Mr. Y.V. Giri, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners in CWJC No. 21397 of 2018 submits that the petitioners, who are working as teachers had acquired their B.Ed qualification in between the year 1979-81 to 1986 from the Chhota Nagpur Prathmik Sikchhak Sichha Mahavidyalaya, Ranchi.

3. The Education Department found certain discrepancies upon inspection conducted of the said college and thereafter, issued an order dated 30.09.1986 to de-recognise the said Teachers Education College w.e.f. 30th September, 1986.

4. Learned counsel has further taken this Court to the said order to submit that the college was dully recognized on 26th February, 1975 and continued to remain recognized till the order was passed on 30th September, 1986.

5. Learned counsel submits that on account of derecognition and erroneous interpretation the petitioners' salary was stopped. The petitioners, therefore, preferred a writ petition before this Court and this Court in CW