Back
ANIL KUMAR SINHA
Savita Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER
The petitioner has preferred the present writ application challenging the impugned order of suspension dated 31.08.2019 (Annexure-8 to the writ petition) passed by the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Samastipur whereby the petitioner has been put under suspension from the post of “Assistant Teacher” on a complaint made by one unknown person that her training institute has been derecognized. The petitioner has also challenged Annexure-9 i.e. the charge memo for initiating departmental proceeding against the petitioner. Salary for the suspension period has also been prayed by her.
2. The petitioner was admitted in the Basic Teachers’ Training Course at Ranchi in the Session 1982-84 and completed her training in 1984 itself. Thereafter Certificate was granted to the petitioner in 1985 which is at Annexure-3 to the writ application. The dispute is that the institute from where the petitioner has completed her Matric training got derecognized in the year 1986.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on a query made by the petitioner under R.T.I. the Bihar School Examination Board (for short “BSEB”) has informed that the Certificate issued by the BSEB regarding
The court reaffirmed that appointments based on invalid qualifications can be deemed fraudulent and upheld the necessity of proving the legitimacy of educational credentials.
The court emphasized the need for a detailed inquiry before terminating an appointment and upheld the entitlement to back wages upon reinstatement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
