SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Archana Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J.—Heard the parties.
2. All the cases are heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
3. The petitioners assail the order passed by the State Appellate Authority, dated 18.08.2022. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have obtained qualification from Madhayamik Shiksha Parishad, Delhi, which has verified that they had passed from the said institution. Learned counsel further submits that the District Appellate Authority had held that the petitioners to be duly qualified and directed the petitioners to continue on the post of teachers.
Learned counsel submits that the order was challenged after two years before the State Appellate Authority by the State and the State Appellate Authority has erroneously set aside the order of the District Appellate Authority and held the petitioners ineligible to continue on the post of teachers and the order of cancellation of their appointment was upheld wrongfully.
Learned counsel submits that the State Appellate Authority has failed to take notice of the order of the District Education Officer, Khagaria whereby he has started in the year 2008 only about derecognition of the sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.