SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 336

RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Bijay Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Neeraj Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh.

JUDGMENT

RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J.:–

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for quashing the order dated 20.06.2001 (Annexure-4) passed by the Collector, Patna (respondent no. 2) whereby and whereunder the permanent lease deed of the petitioners have been cancelled and has resumed the land in question including the structures standing thereupon belonging to the petitioners; further directed to the petitioners to handover the said land with structures to the Circle Officer, Sadar, Patna (respondent no. 4) by 02.07.2001.

3. Briefly stated the facts of the case as stated in the writ petition that 7 katha, 12 dhurs and 9 dhurkies piece of land was permanent leased out to Smt. Radha Rani Devi permanently from generation to generation with full rights of transfer and peaceful enjoyment without any interruption or disturbances by the lessor and was allowed to errect building in accordance with the plans and specification approved by the Municipality. The lessee after the grant of permanent lease from generation to generation constructed a house on the land in question fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top