MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, J.:–Regard being had to the commonality of the controversy in both the aforesaid writ petitions, it was thought apposite to hear them analogously and accordingly, they were heard together with the consent of the parties and are being disposed off by the present singular order.

2. The first writ petition i.e. CWJC No, 7445 of 2004 has been filed for quashing the order dated 28.02.2004 passed by the Collector, Patna, whereby and whereunder, the prayer made by the petitioner for considering him as the original lessee, has been rejected, whereas the second writ petition i.e. CWJC No. 9593 of 2004 has been filed for quashing the order dated 02.08.2004, contained in Memo dated 31.07.2004, whereby the petitioner has been informed that while resuming the Khas Mahal Land settled vide temporary lease deed, bearing plot no. 52, Block-C, admeasuring an area of 5 katha and 8 dhurs, along with the structures made thereon, in light of the order contained in letter no. 786 dated 10.07.2004 of the Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna, it is ordered to take the said land along with the construction made thereon into Government's possession, thus the possession of the sa