SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 423

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH, J.
(28.7.2022)
Criminal Misc. No. 46020 of 2019
Jitendra Nath : Petitioner
Vs.
State of Bihar : Opp. Party

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Anuj Kumar.
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Ajay Mishra.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120B/34 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 482 – Criminal breach of trust, forgery and conspiracy by public servant – Cognizance of offence – Document in question which is being relied upon by petitioner was not even in existence at the time of cognizance – Genuineness of educational certificates can only be decided in trial after evidences are adduced on behalf of parties – It is genuineness of documents submitted by petitioner at the time of appointment which is subject matter of present case and not affiliation or recognition of college – Grounds taken by petitioner to assail order of cognizance fall in realm of defence which cannot be seen at this stage – At the stage of taking cognizance Court below is required to take into consideration averments made in complaint/FIR or evidence collected during course of investigation or led in support thereof with limited purpose to find out as to whether there is sufficient material to proceed against petitioner – Impugned order upheld. (Paras 6 to 8)

PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH, J.:–This application has been filed for quashing of order dated 01.08.2017 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in Parihar PS Case No. 23 of 2016 corresponding to Trial No. 3616 of 2018 whereby and whereunder the court below has been pleased to take cognizance of offence punishable under Sections 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner.

2. Prosecution case in brief is that this petitioner along with other four named accused persons obtained appointment on the basis of forged and fabricated educational certificates. On the basis of aforesaid written application Parihar PS Case No. 23 of 2016 for offence under Sections 467, 468, 471, 409, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code was registered and after investigation charge-sheet was submitted and cognizance for offence under Sections 409, 467, 468, 471, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code was taken against the petitioner and others.

3. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner was appointed after following due courses of law and joined his duty on 21.12.2006. He was working as an Assistant Teacher, Middle School, Daraharwa falling within Parihar Block of District Sitamarhi. It is next contended that petitioner was regular student of B.Ed course. Petitioner was appointed as Block Teacher having qualification of MA, B.Ed Teacher. He was regular student of B.Ed. Course in academic sessions of 1994-95 of S. Wakil Ahmad Teacher’s Training College, Darbhanga. The examination of students of Sessions 1994-95 was held in 1998 and result was published in the year 1998. The aforesaid training college was affiliated to L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga. Petitioner was student of the training course. However, in the year 2000 the Examination Controller of L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga by Memo No. X(C) 1868-78/2000 cancelled the admission, examination, result, mark-sheet and certificate of students of S. Wakil Ahmad Teacher’s Training (B.Ed.) College, Murgiachak, Bandh Road, Laherisarai, Lalbagh, Darbhanga on the ground that affiliation granted to the college was cancelled with retrospective effect. Subsequently, in compliance of the direction issued by the Hon’ble Court in CWJC No. 13108 of 2016, the Registrar, L. N. Mithila University by Memo No. 372/18 dated 06.01.2018 withdrew the notification issued vide Memo No. XC/1667- 1867/2000 dated 29.02.2000 by which examination result, mark-sheet and provisional certificates of B.Ed. for the sessions 1985-86 to 1996-97 of S. Wakil Ahmad Teachers Training College, Darbhanga, was withdrawn and results of aforesaid academic sessions were declared valid.

4. It is the contention of the petitioner that FIR was lodged solely on the ground that the qualification of B.Ed. of the petitioner was obtained from the college which was non-affiliated college. Now, in view of the subsequent withdrawal order passed by Registrar LN Mithila University vide Annexure- 3 to the petition, there is no material on record to show that the certificates submitted by the petitioner was forged and fabricated. Hence, continuation of criminal proceeding is gross abuse of the process of law and it is not in the interest of justice. There is no chance of conviction and continuance of the proceeding is futile and wastage of Hon’ble Court’s time.

5. However, counsel for the State opposed the submissions made on behalf of petitioner and submitted that on the inquiry conducted by the Vigilance Investigation Bureau the present FIR has been lodged and after thorough investigation chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioner and others under Sections 467, 468, 471, 409, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. At the stage of taking cognizance the court below is not required to look into the merit and demerit of the case. There is sufficient materials to proceed against the petitioner for taking cognizance against the petitioner.

6. Heard rival submissions of the parties and perused the materials and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top