Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Suman Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State Of U P – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
Ref : Order on Civil Misc. Recall/Restoration Application No.16 of 2026
1. The present restoration application has been filed for recalling the order dated 06.04.2026 passed by this Hon'ble Court, by which instant writ petition has been dismissed as infructuous.
2. Application has been filed within time. In view of the liberty granted by the order dated 06.04.2026 and the reasons as disclosed in the affidavit, which are satisfactory, the restoration application is allowed
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is restored to its original number.
Ref : Order on writ petition
4. Heard Mr. Harish Chandra Pratap, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Devesh Vikram, learned counsel for respondent-BSA and Mr.Shailendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner passed her High School and Intermediate examinations from the Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, U.P. in the years 1989 and 1991 respectively. Thereafter, she pursued the degree of Bachelor of Arts from Sri Tikaram Kanya Mahavidyalaya, Aligarh, affiliated with Agra University, in the year 1992 and qualified the same in the year 1994. Subs
An appointment secured through fraudulent documents is void ab initio, and no formal inquiry is required for cancellation; fraud vitiates all actions taken under such circumstances.
Point of law: If the University records a finding about any of the candidates holding tampered mark-sheets, then the order of termination/cancellation of appointments would have effect but it would b....
An appointment secured through fraudulent means, such as a forged educational certificate, is void ab initio, and the individual is not entitled to any employment benefits or protections under the la....
Fraudulent appointments are void ab initio, and individuals securing employment through deceit cannot claim protections under Article 311 of the Constitution.
Qualifications obtained from unrecognized institutions prior to the N.C.T.E. Act are valid and should be recognized for employment purposes, as established by the Supreme Court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
