HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
Preeti Jaiswal - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others - Respondents
WRIT - A No. - 11875 of 2025
Decided On : 03-04-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed challenging suspension. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner’s educational qualifications and appointment details. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. process of verification of petitioner’s degree. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. grounds for challenging appointment cancellation. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. inquiry committee recommendations mentioned. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 6. respondent's defense regarding the inquiry and suspension. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 7. fraudulent actions leading to the annulment of appointment. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 8. discrepancies in mark sheets and tampering. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 9. court's observations on procedure and validity. (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , 69) |
| 10. court's reasoning on procedural adherence and application of fraud principles. (Para 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79) |
| 11. legal principles governing employment based on false documents. (Para 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84) |
| 12. framework surrounding void appointments. (Para 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129) |
| 13. clarification of the legal stance on fraudulent appointments. (Para 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134) |
| 14. principles related to fraudulent documents. (Para 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139) |
| 15. final adjudication and order. (Para 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144) |
JUDGMENT :
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard Mr. Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Chandan Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.4 and 5, Mr. Shailendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2, Sri Ashish Kumar Nagvanshi, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.3, 6 and 7 and perused the record.
2. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
“(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 28.07.2025 passed by Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Gorakhpur.
(ii) A writ, order or direction of suitable nature restraining the respondents from interfering with the working of the petitioner as Assistant Teacher at Prathmik Vidyalay Jangal Dumri No.1, Development Block Bhathat, District Gorakhpur and to pay the petitioner her full monthly salary of the said post regularly every month.
(iii) Any other relief as this Court may deem fit and proper in the facts & circumstances of the case.”
3. Placing the brief facts of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the educational qualification of the petitioner is High School, Intermediate, Bachelor of Arts Degree, Bachelor of Education and Special BTC Training Course, 2008. In the year 2008 selection proceedings were undertaken by the State Government for admission to Special BTC Training Course 2008 to such candidates who possessed some other teacher’s training qualification.
4. Accordingly, the petitioner also applied in pursuance thereof, and was selected and underwent training at District Institute of Education & Training, Gorakhpur. On successful completion of Special BTC Training Course 2008, the petitioner was issued a certificate dated 21.12.2009. Upon declaration of the result of Special BTC Training Course, the petitioner became entitled for automatic appointment as an Assistant Teacher, accordingly, based upon the result of Special BTC Training Course, 2008, the petitioner was issued appointment order dated 06.02.2010.
5. The petitioner forthwith joined and thereafter has been working continuously up to the satisfaction of her superiors. The work and conduct of the petitioner has been fully satisfactory. The petitioner was at the relevant point of time was posted at Prathmik Vidyalaya Jangal Dumri No.1, Development Block Bhathat, District Gorakhpur. The petitioner has been paid her regular monthly salary up to the month of June 2025.
6. The petitioner passed her Bachelor of Arts Course as a student of St. Andrew’s College, Gorakhpur, affiliated to Deen Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur (in short ‘Gorakhpur University’). The aforesaid degree as awarded to th


Poonam Shukla vs. State of U.P. and others
Krishna Kant vs. State of U.P. & 2 Others
State of Bihar v. Radha Krishna Singh and others
LIC of India and another v. Ram Pal Singh Bisen
Mansaram v. S.P. Pathak and others
Radhe Shyam Yadav & Another v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others
A.P. State Financial Corporation v. M/S GAR Re-Rolling Mills and another
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath
R. Vishwanatha Pillai v. State of Kerala and others
Bank of India and another v. Avinash D. Mandivikar and others
An appointment secured through fraudulent documents is void ab initio, and no formal inquiry is required for cancellation; fraud vitiates all actions taken under such circumstances.
Fraudulent documentation undermines claims for educational qualifications, disallowing entitlement effects from misrepresentation; courts emphasize integrity in certification processes.
An appointment obtained through fraud or misrepresentation is void ab initio, and procedural safeguards do not apply in such cases.
Point of law: If the University records a finding about any of the candidates holding tampered mark-sheets, then the order of termination/cancellation of appointments would have effect but it would b....
An educational marksheet cannot be deemed forged without proper inquiry and substantial evidence, while public appointment must adhere to merit-based selection principles under natural justice standa....
Employment obtained through fraudulent documentation does not require adherence to formal disciplinary procedures, as fraud vitiates employment.
Fraudulent appointments are void ab initio, and individuals securing employment through deceit cannot claim protections under Article 311 of the Constitution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.