Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Preeti Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard Mr. Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Chandan Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.4 and 5, Mr. Shailendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2, Sri Ashish Kumar Nagvanshi, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.3, 6 and 7 and perused the record.
2. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
“(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 28.07.2025 passed by Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Gorakhpur.
(ii) A writ, order or direction of suitable nature restraining the respondents from interfering with the working of the petitioner as Assistant Teacher at Prathmik Vidyalay Jangal Dumri No.1, Development Block Bhathat, District Gorakhpur and to pay the petitioner her full monthly salary of the said post regularly every month.
(iii) Any other relief as this Court may deem fit and proper in the facts & circumstances of the case.”
3. Placing the brief facts of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the educational qualification of the petitioner is High School, Intermediate, Bachelor of Arts Degree, Bachelor of Education and Special BTC
An appointment secured through fraudulent documents is void ab initio, and no formal inquiry is required for cancellation; fraud vitiates all actions taken under such circumstances.
Fraudulent documentation undermines claims for educational qualifications, disallowing entitlement effects from misrepresentation; courts emphasize integrity in certification processes.
An appointment obtained through fraud or misrepresentation is void ab initio, and procedural safeguards do not apply in such cases.
Point of law: If the University records a finding about any of the candidates holding tampered mark-sheets, then the order of termination/cancellation of appointments would have effect but it would b....
An educational marksheet cannot be deemed forged without proper inquiry and substantial evidence, while public appointment must adhere to merit-based selection principles under natural justice standa....
Employment obtained through fraudulent documentation does not require adherence to formal disciplinary procedures, as fraud vitiates employment.
Fraudulent appointments are void ab initio, and individuals securing employment through deceit cannot claim protections under Article 311 of the Constitution.
Deliberate inflation of academic marks in application forms constitutes material misrepresentation, invalidating employment contracts under established legal principles of public trust and recruitmen....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a plea of prejudice due to non-supply of the inquiry report is not valid if the delinquent employee did not deny the charges and could not est....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
