SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 500

SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Mahesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Dhirendra Kumar Sinha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Baidya Nath Thakur.
For the Respondents: M/s Nand Kishore Singh, Abinash Kumar.

SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA, J.:–Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This Civil Revision application has been preferred under Section 14 (8) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 against the Judgment and order dated 04.04.2016 passed in Eviction Suit No. 17 of 1998 by the 2nd Munsif, Darbhanga whereby the suit has been decreed on contest in favour of plaintiffs and the defendants have been directed to vacate the suit premises within two months and to hand over possession to the plaintiffs, otherwise they will be entitled to the same by the process of the court.

3. The original plaintiff Sri Mahendra Narayan Sinha (after his death his legal heirs substituted) filed suit for eviction of the defendants (wife, sons and daughters of his brother Surendra Narayan Sinha) from the suit premises stating that, one Gobardhan Lal had three sons namely, Nagendra Narayan Lal, Surendra Narayan Sinha and Mahendra Narayan Sinha. The plaintiff claimed that in the family arrangement of 1966 the suit property fall in the share of the plaintiff. After death of his brother Surendra Narayan Sinha in 1989 as help plaintiff inducted the defendants in the suit premises and later on m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top