SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 860

KHATIM REZA
Sima Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Usha Mishra – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Sandeep Patil.
For the Respondent: Mr. Diwakar Upadhyaya.

Khatim Reza, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This Civil Revision application has been filed under Section 14(8) of the Bihar Building (Lease Rent and Eviction Control) Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as BBC Act) against the judgment and decree dated 15.09.2017 passed by the Munsif-II, Sadar, Bhagalpur, in Eviction Suit No. 07 of 2006, which was filed for seeking eviction of the defendants/petitioners for the suit premises on the ground of personal necessity alone.

3. The plaintiff has pleaded that she along with her family members require the suit premises for her residence therein as she is presently residing in a tenanted premise. The defendants denied the title of the plaintiff and there is no relationship of landlord and tenant between the plaintiff and defendants.

4. The brief facts of the case is that plaintiff/opposite party is the owner and land lady within the meaning of BBC Act in respect of the suit premises which was purchased by the plaintiff from Shri Murari Mishra, Narendra Mishra and Stayendra Mishra besides other minors through two registered sale deeds on 01.02.1996 after payment of full consideration amount for which separate money receipts were gran

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top