Back
SANJAY KAROL, PARTHA SARTHY
Akshayabat Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Sanjay Karol, CJ.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioners have prayed for the following relief(s):—
(A) For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs order/orders direction/directions directing and commanding the respondents authorities to make payment of the admitted dues amount of Rs. 232749.25/- against the supply of 93.15 quintal of rice in the year 2017-18 from the petitioners along with its interest.
(B) For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs order/orders direction/directions directing and commanding the respondents authorities for safeguarding the interest of the petitioner on its office bearers any of the ill effects of non-payment of the admitted dues within time i.e. putting inducting the name of the petitioners in the default list of the Bank debarring the office bearers for contesting the Election of the Society.
(C) For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs order/orders direction/directions directing and commanding the respondents authorities to insure the smooth functioning of the petitioners societies as the same had badly been effected due to nonpayment of the aforesaid admissible due amount.
(D) For any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is lega
The government has a responsibility to protect the rights of citizens and to expedite dispensation of justice, as outlined in the Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adhering to the Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011, and the provisions of Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
