Bhaglu Mandal vs State of Bihar - 2022 Supreme(Pat) 718

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Pat) 718

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Bhaglu Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ram Hriday Prasad.
For the Respondents: M/s Sheo Shankar Prasad, Sanjay Kumar.

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, learned SC-8 for the State.

2. Petitioner, in the present case, is seeking compensation for his illegal detention in prison from 24.07.2016 to 01.08.2016.

Case of the Petitioner

3. It is stated that the petitioner was made an accused in Sadar P.S., Darbhanga Case No.27 of 1993 dated 14.02.1993 for the offences under Sections 148, 149, 109, 331, 332, 353, 341, 504, 307, 431 IPC, Sections 26/27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act.

4. In the said case, the petitioner faced trial in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, First, Darbhanga and vide judgment dated 13.09.2010 passed by the learned trial court, he was acquitted after finding him innocent on the ground of lack of evidence. A copy of the judgment of the learned trial court has been placed on record as Annexure-2 to the writ application.

5. It is alleged that on 24.07.2016, the officer incharge, Sonaki O.P. (Darbhanga P.S.) came at the house of the petitioner with some constables and took him in custody. The specific case of the petitioner is that despite his request saying that he had already been acqui

Click Here to Read the rest of this document