SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 581

P. B. BAJANTHRI, PURNENDU SINGH
Rajeshwar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : M/s Binit Kumar, U.B. Roy, P.K. Verma, Sr. Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anand Kumar.

P. B. Bajanthri, J.—In the instant LPA, appellant has assailed the order of the learned Single Judge dated 19.01.2015 passed in C.W.J.C No 6255 of 2011. The appellant was appointed as a conductor with the respondent Corporation in the year 1979. He was alleged to have committed misdeed while discharging his duties in not issuing tickets to the number of passengers. During inspection by the Inspecting Squad the appellant was caught and he could not give his explanation in not issuing tickets to passengers. On the other hand, passengers were stated to have purchased tickets from the Inspecting Squad. Based on these allegations appellant was placed under suspension on 06.02.2009 and he was charge-sheeted in a disciplinary inquiry 03.03.2009. The appellant is stated to have submitted his reply and was not satisfied by the Disciplinary Authority. Thus Disciplinary Authority proceeded to appoint inquiring and presenting officers to hold the inquiry on the alleged charges. The Inquiring Officer is stated to have submitted his report on 20.08.2009 in holding that the charges levelled against the appellant were proved. Thereafter disciplinary authority proceeded to issue second show cause n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top