SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 839

P. B. BAJANTHRI
Lal Babu Manjhi – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s Ebrahim Kabir, Shruti Sinha.
For the Respondents: M/s N.H. Khan, Babita Kumari.

P. B. Bajanthri, J.—Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

2. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:—

“That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ order or direction for quashing memo no- 985/Ra.Ka. dt. 24.02.2020 issued by S.P. Siwan whereby in the light of order of dismissal passed by the D.I.G. Saran Range Chapra vide Range Order No.- 45/2020 memo no-535/Go dt.- 22.02.2020 the petitioner has been dismissed from service Annexure- 4 and also ordering respondents to produce range order no. - 45/20 memo no- 535/Go dt. - 22.02.2020 issued by D.I.G. Saran Range Chapra whereby petitioner has been dismissed from service as copy of the same has not been supplied to petitioner and then to quash the same also quash the order of S.P. Siwan memo no. - 2814/Ra.Ka. dt.- 12.07.20 Annexure-6 in which he has informing that A.D.G. (Law and Order) Bihar Patna has rejected the appeal of petitioner ordered for making district order and also for ordering respondents to produce letter no. - Vi. Vaya-Go/Appeal Abhyavedan- 12/2020/101 dt 08.06.2020 whereby appeal of petitioner has been rejected and then to quash the same as said order has not been sup

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top