PURNENDU SINGH
Anand Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Purnendu Singh, J.—Heard Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, learned Senior Counsel, along with Mr. Vipin Kumar Singh, Ms. Smriti Singh and Ms. Nikita Mittal, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. P.K. Verma, learned AAG 3 appearing on behalf of the State.
RELIEF
2. The petitioner in paragraph no.1 of the present writ petition have, inter alia, sought following refief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter:—
(i)For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing letter no. 4460 dated 25.06.2021 issued by office of Superintendent of Police whereby the recommendation has been given for dismissal of petitioner under Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India without holding regular departmental proceeding as prescribed under the Civil (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as CCA Rules, 2005).
(ii) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing order passed by the Deputy Inspector General, Shahabad Region, Dehri-on- Sone contained in memo no.1708 dated 08.07.2021 whereby the order has been passed by the disciplinary authori
Ved Mitter Gill vs. Union Territory Administration, Chandigarh
Tarsem Singh vs. State of Punjab
State of Punjab vs. Harbhajan Singh
Krushnakant B. Parmar vs. Union of India
Avtar Singh vs. Union of India
(1) Dismissal from service without conducting departmental inquiry – It is duty of disciplinary authority to record satisfaction how and in what manner holding an enquiry is not reasonably practicabl....
Dismissal from service matter - Rule 23 of Rules of 1991 clearly indicate that provisions of Revision are not mandatory in nature and are clearly at discretion of Officer whose appeal has been reject....
The authority must provide objective justifications for the impracticability of holding an inquiry under Article 311(2)(b) and the dismissal of a regular member of the force is a drastic measure that....
Disciplinary action under Article 311(2)(b) must be supported by robust evidence; reliance on mere presumptions about witness intimidation without conducting an inquiry contravenes natural justice pr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.