MADHURESH PRASAD
Jay Jay Kishore Sardar @ Jay Kishore Sardar @ Jayki – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor (for short ‘APP’) for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defects as pointed out by office when called upon to do so by the office. Instead of
3. The petitioner seeks bail in Pratapganj PS Case no. 114 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. After collecting money for his employer the informant was on his way when his driver stopped the vehicle for relieving himself four unknown persons have looted the money and assaulted the informant.
5. Petitioner’s counsel submits that the First Information Report is against unknown persons. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Petitioner's name has been dragged in this case on the basis of statement of co-accused Md. Raju. The statement has been recorded in police custody and is unreliable. From the said co-accused there is recovery of money and Aadhar Card of the informant. However, from the petitioner there is no recovery of any incriminating material. The driver of the vehicle co
The court emphasizes the necessity of merit in opposing bail applications, particularly considering prior favorable rulings for the accused.
Bail – Accused can be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.
The court allowed bail with strict conditions to prevent trial delays while acknowledging the petitioner’s claims of false implication.
The court denies bail due to serious charges and the petitioner's criminal history, ordering expedited trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.