SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 1168

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J,
CWJC No. 8476 of 2020
(19.3.2021)
Amrita Devi ... Petitioner
vs.
State of Bihar & Ors. ... Respondents

Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg.
For the Respondents: Mr. Lalit Kishore.

Headnote:

Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 – Section 25 – Removal of Chief Councillor/Deputy Chief Councillor – No-confidence motion shall not be brought against Chief Councillor/Deputy Chief Councillor within a period of two years of taking over charge of post – Petitioner was elected as Chief Councillor on 19.09.2019 and any no-confidence motion could have been brought against her only on or after 18.09.2021 – Requisition, fixation of date as well as resolution allowing no-confidence motion against petitioner is in derogation of Section 25 (4) of Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 and cannot be sustained in eyes of law – Resolution, requisition as also fixation of date set aside. (Paras 5 to 8)

ORDER

A counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 5 has been filed during the course of argument. Let it be taken on record.

2. Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, learned counsel for State Election Commission; and Mr. Subhash Prasad Singh, learned GA-3 for the State.

3. This writ petition was initially filed for quashing the Memo No. 162, dated 18.09.2020, issued by Respondent No. 5 / Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Barsoi, whereby he had fixed a special meeting for 23d of September, 2020 at 11.00 A.M. for deliberations over no-confidence motion against the petitioner as well as for quashing the requisition of no-confidence motion dated 02.09.2020.

4. During the pendency of this writ petition, noconfidence was carried against the petitioner on 23.09.2020, which resolution also has been challenged by the petitioner by way of Interlocutory Application (Annexure- R 2/1).

5. The sole ground raised by the petitioner is that no-confidence motion against the petitioner could not have been fixed or carried through within two years of her taking over the responsibility of the Chief Councilor.

6. Section 25 of the Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 which deals with removal of Chief Councilor/Deputy Chief Councilor specifically provides that no-confidence motion shall not be brought against the Chief Councilor/Deputy Chief Councilor within a period of two years of taking over the charge of the post.

7. Admittedly the petitioner was elected as Chief Councilor on 19.09.2019 and therefore any no-confidence motion could have been brought against her only on or after 18.09.2021.

8. The requisition, the fixation of date as well as the resolution dated 23.09.2020 allowing the noconfidence motion against the petitioner therefore is in derogation of Section 25 (4) of the Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 and cannot be sustained in the eyes of law.

9. For the aforesaid reasons, the resolution dated 23.09.2020, the requisition as also the fixation of date are set aside.

10. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top