SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Pat) 747

ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
B. N. & Associates – Appellant
Versus
Pramod Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Bishwa Nath Chaudhary.
For the Respondents: M/s Nilma Sinha, Ajay Kumar Jain.

Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J. – Against the judgment dated 9.4.2018 and decree dated 16.4.2018 passed by the Sub Judge II, Patna in Title Suit No. 274/2010, whereby and whereunder instead of decreeing the suit for specific performance of contract, the defendants/respondents have been directed to pay the amount which they received as an earnest money without cost has been put under challenge under instant appeal at the instance of the plaintiffs- appellants. In order to properly identify the parties they are being introduced through their original status.

2. The plaintiffs/appellants filed the suit for specific performance of contract under the garb of an agreement dated 19.7.2008 entered amongst defendants/ respondents no. 1 and 2 in one set, the defendants/respondents no. 3 to 6 in another set, with regard to an area 1.59½ acre, respectively lying under Khata No. 166, Khesra No. 562 of village Nathupur, P.S. Parsa Bazar, District Patna. In order to properly appreciate the case of the parties, as set up, be briefly stated as-

It has been pleaded at the end of the plaintiffs that Guru Sahay Gope S/o Ganga Gope purchased survey plot no. 562 corresponding to Khata No. 166, area 3 acres 19 de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top